Wednesday 18 November 2009, 12:00AM
PEARLS
No. 204, October 2009, written by Brian R McAvoy - download
pdf
Clinical question
How effective are non-pharmacological interventions in assisting
induction of anaesthesia in children?
Bottom line
In single studies, a quiet environment, clown doctors, video
games and computer packages (but not music therapy) each showed
benefits, such as improved cooperation in children. One study of
acupuncture for parents found the parent was less anxious and the
child was more cooperative at induction of anaesthesia. Another
study of giving parents information, in the form of pamphlets or
videos, failed to show an effect. The presence of parents at
induction of the child's anaesthesia was not shown to reduce
anxiety or distress in children, or increase their cooperation.
Caveat
Most of the outcomes of this review were based on single
studies. Although most studies used some sort of scoring system,
few used the same score for measuring anxiety and cooperation.
Similarly, other outcome measures were rarely consistent across
studies. Even though only randomised or quasi-randomised controlled
trials were included in this review, poor methodology and
inadequate reporting limited data extraction and presentation of
analyses.
Context
The induction of anaesthesia in children can be distressing for
the child and also for their parents. Children can be given drugs
to sedate them, but these drugs can have unwanted harmful effects,
such as possible airway obstruction and behaviour changes after the
operation. Some non-drug alternatives have been tested to see if
they could be used instead of sedatives.
Cochrane Systematic Review
Yip P et al. Non-pharmacological interventions for assisting the
induction of anaesthesia in children. Cochrane Reviews 2009, Issue
3. Article No. CD006447. DOI: 10.1002/14651858. CD006447.pub2. This
review contains 17 studies involving 1796 participants.