Tuesday 29 June 2010, 10:54AM
PEARLS 259, May 2010, written by Brian R McAvoy
Clinical question
How effective is ad libitum or demand/semi-demand feeding for
preterm infants in the transition phase from intragastric tube to
oral feeding?
Bottom line
Three trials reported that, compared with scheduled interval
feeding, an ad libitum or demand/semi-demand feeding regimen for
preterm infants allowed earlier attainment of full oral feeding and
earlier hospital discharge (by about 2 to 4 days). Other trials did
not confirm this finding.
Caveat
The trials were generally small and of variable methodological
quality. The duration of the intervention and the duration of data
collection and follow-up in most of the trials were not likely to
have allowed detection of measurable effects on growth.
Context
Scheduled interval feeding of prescribed enteral volumes is current
standard practice for preterm infants. Feeding preterm infants in
response to their hunger and satiation cues (ad libitum or
de-mand/semi demand) rather than at scheduled intervals might help
in the establishment of independent oral feeding, increase nutrient
intake and growth rates, and allow earlier hospital discharge.
Cochrane Systematic Review
McCormick FM et al. Ad libitum or demand/semi-demand feeding versus
scheduled interval feeding for preterm infants. Cochrane Reviews
2010, Issue 2. Article No. CD005255. DOI:
10.1002/14651858.CD005255.pub3. This review contains 8 studies
involving 496 participants.