Thursday 25 March 2010, 10:03AM
PEARLS No. 229, February 2010, written by Brian R McAvoy
Methyldopa has moderate efficacy in primary hypertension
Clinical question
How effective is methyldopa in primary hypertension?
Bottom line
Based on the limited number of published randomised controlled
trials, the blood pressure (BP) lowering effect of methyldopa,
given at doses of 500Ð2250mg daily, was moderate (-18/-18mmHg),
compared with placebo. The most commonly studied daily dose of
methyldopa was 750mg daily. Most studies followed patients for 4 to
6 weeks of therapy. Overall, reporting of adverse effects was poor,
so no conclusions can be drawn about the adverse effect profile.
Despite this, clinicians must weigh the risks of potential serious
side effects with use of methyldopa that include haemolytic
anaemia, hepatotoxicity and lupus-like syndrome, against the
benefits of BP reduction, with no proven beneficial effect on
adverse cardiovascular outcomes. None of the studies reported on
mortality or morbidity outcomes.
Caveat
Overall, the quality of evidence was compromised, secondary to
the unclear nature of random sequence generation and allocation
concealment procedures of almost all trials. Moreover, many of the
trials did not report complete outcomes data (all cause mortality,
cardiovascular mortality, non-cardiovascular mortality, serious
adverse events, fatal and non-fatal myocardial infarction, and
fatal and non-fatal stroke) for all randomised patients. Thus, the
estimation of the true effect of methyldopa on outcomes, such as BP
effects, is likely an overestimate.
Context
Methyldopa is a centrally acting antihypertensive agent, which
was commonly used in the 1970s and 1980s for BP control. It has
largely been replaced by antihypertensive drug classes with fewer
side effects, but it is still used in developing countries due to
its low cost.
Cochrane Systematic Review
Mah GT et al. Methyldopa for primary hypertension. Cochrane
Reviews 2009, Issue 4. Article No. CD003893. DOI:
10.1002/14651858.CD003893.pub3. This review contains 12 studies
involving 595 participants.