Media release from ACC Minister Maryan StreetSaturday 17 November 2007, 5:00PM
Media release from ACC Minister Maryan Street
ACC Minister Maryan Street today released the report into the
Review of the way in which physiotherapy services are funded and
accredited by ACC.
The review forms part of the Labour-led government's confidence and
supply agreement with New Zealand First. The report makes
recommendations regarding the funding and accreditation
arrangements for physiotherapists, the relationship between ACC and
the physiotherapy profession, and ACC processes relating to
monitoring, audit and investigation activities.
"The government will work promptly with ACC and physiotherapists on
the recommendations related to non-fiscal measures. Other
recommendations which have funding implications will need to be
considered in conjunction with other budget priorities. A formal
government response to the report will now be developed and
considered," said Maryan Street.
"The Labour-led government's priorities for the ACC scheme are to
maintain it as a fully public social insurance scheme which focuses
on injury prevention, along with fair and effective treatment and
rehabilitation provisions.
"I am grateful to David Goddard QC for the excellent work he has
done to produce this report and to New Zealand First deputy leader
Peter Brown for his commitment and cooperation," said Maryan
Street.
New Zealand First deputy leader Peter Brown said this is an issue
which has been of particular concern to New Zealand First since
physiotherapists first raised it, "which is why we negotiated it
into the Confidence and Supply Agreement."
"Having said that I must compliment the Government, particularly
former ACC Minister Ruth Dyson, for encouraging and implementing a
thorough review. David Goddard QC and all those who assisted
have done an excellent job. The issues have been properly and
thoroughly identified, the report recommends reasonable and
practical solutions and I look forward to working with the new ACC
Minister Maryan Street on them", said Peter Brown.
Background questions and answers
What has led to the review?
The Confidence and Supply Agreement between the Government and New
Zealand First includes a review of the way in which physiotherapy
services are funded and accredited.
The review addresses a number of concerns that have been expressed
in recent years about the funding and accreditation by ACC of
physiotherapy services.
Over recent years there have been a number of changes to how ACC
funds physiotherapy services and this review is being conducted to
ensure that those that need physiotherapy following injury have
affordable access to treatment, and that funding arrangements are
sustainable and fair to physiotherapists.
What did the review assess?
The review assessed the adequacy of the current regulatory and
purchasing arrangement for physiotherapists within the ACC
regime.
The review focused on the differing payment and contractual regimes
for physiotherapists contracted under the Endorsed Provider Network
and those who receive payments regulated under the IPRC (Liability
to Pay or Contribute to Cost of Treatment) Regulations 2003.
The primary concern was the sustainability of provision of
physiotherapy services under the present ACC regime, in the long
term interests of ACC claimants.
How was the review conducted?
The review was conducted by David Goddard, QC and included wide
consultation with stakeholders in the form of written submissions
and a number of hearings and conferences.
The written submissions, oral hearings and reports of David
Goddard, QC will be made publicly available on the Department of
Labour website.
Who was involved?
A wide range of key stakeholders affected by the current
accreditation and funding arrangement were consulted in the course
of the review. This included (among others):
• ACC
• The New Zealand Society of Physiotherapists
• New Zealand College of Physiotherapists
• New Zealand Private Physiotherapists' Association
• Physiotherapy Trust of New Zealand
• Occupational Physiotherapists Special Interest Group
• A number of physiotherapy practitioners
• A number of claimant representatives
• The Office of the Health and Disability Commissioner
• District Health Boards' Physiotherapy Advisors, Leaders and
Managers Group
• The Office of the Privacy Commissioner
• New Zealand Law Society ACC Sub-Committee
Parties to the review also provided expert reports on pricing and
remuneration issues from:
• Deloitte
• KPMG
• Strategic Pay Ltd
What did the review find?
The review makes a number of recommendations that provide options
for promoting the sustainable funding of physiotherapy services,
and fairness to physiotherapists.
The review notes that current levels of funding should be increased
in order to address sustainability issues for the physiotherapy
sector.
The review proposes two options on the topic of whether to allow
co-payments or not:
• To retain the existing funding arrangements that prohibit
co-payments for Endorsed Provider Network providers but to increase
the payments made under those agreements; or
• To remove the prohibition on co-payments and increase payments as
far as affordable.
The Review also made recommendations about:
• Adopting alternative entry criteria for EPN providers, based on
postgraduate qualifications and experience;
• Changing the name of the EPN contracts to remove the reference to
'endorsed';
• Giving providers a longer termination period for EPN
contracts;
• Establishing guidance, transparency and improved culture around
ACC's processes for monitoring, audit and investigation of
providers, and the use of treatment profiles for this
purpose;
• Improving processes and guidelines for identifying the
appropriate number of treatments for each claimant;
• Improving the efficiency and fairness of processes for approving
funding for claimants who require additional treatment outside
standard guidelines;
• Improving communication about referrals to Activity-Based
Programmes;
• Establishing a clear complaints process for providers;
• Developing better processes in relation to provision of patient
clinical notes to ACC for the purpose of provider audit, monitoring
and investigation. ACC and the Privacy Commissioner have
agreed to work together to address these issues;
• Creating better communication between ACC and physiotherapists
through a partnership model and a consultative approach, with
consideration being given to an 'independent' Chair of the
Physiotherapy Liaison Group with six-monthly reporting; and
• Improving the quality of information used for the purpose of
decision-making on contracts and regulations.