National Party health spokesperson Tony RyallFriday 11 November 2011, 2:14PM
Media release from National Party health spokesperson Tony
Ryall
National is focusing on fewer, more high impact, preventive health
measures to keep more New Zealanders healthy says National
spokesman for health, Tony Ryall.
"This is in contrast to the 180 policy pledges and 'might do's' on
anything and everything in Labour's "policy"
paper.
"Despite Labour's massive health bureaucracy, and scores of health
vision plans and work programmes - what did Labour do for the kids
with rheumatic fever for nine years?
"Labour listed it as a health priority but did nothing else.
"Children with rheumatic fever face serious consequences - ten
years of penicillin injections and significant heart disease.
"Rheumatic fever in our population was at third world levels all
during Labour's term. Yet it has taken a National government to
find the $12 million for a large rheumatic fever prevention
programme in the worst affected areas.
"What effort did Labour put into immunising our children against
disease?
"Over nine years they could only manage to immunise 70 per cent of
all eligible two year olds. National has focused on lifting
immunisation. 91 per cent of two year old children are now
immunised with the greatest increases amongst Maori and Pacific
children - and we're on track to reach 95 per
cent.
"We've dramatically increased the number of health checks for
children before they start school. Labour managed 3,000 in three
years. Now well over 100,000 children have been checked. And there
are more WellChild visits for babies.
"National's home insulation programme Warm Up New Zealand: Heat
Smart has insulated over 130,000 kiwi homes. This is a massive
preventive health initiative that Labour neglected.
"On unhealthy weight, we are spending around $65 million on
nutrition and physical activity programmes, including over $20
million on the Kiwisport initiative. We're bringing greater balance
to the campaign for healthy weight.
"But, once again, Labour wants to spread public health dollars too
thinly, on too many projects, with very little health gain to show
for it.
"Labour does a lot of talking about preventive health but has a
very poor record."