Psychosocial interventions may be of some benefit in prostate cancer

Psychosocial interventions may be of some benefit in prostate cancer

Brian McAvoy
PEARLS No.
455
Clinical question

How effective are psychosocial interventions for men with prostate cancer in improving quality of life (QoL), self-efficacy and knowledge, and in reducing distress, uncertainty and depression?

Bottom line

Psychosocial interventions may have small, short-term beneficial effects on certain domains of wellbeing, as measured by the physical component of general health-related (GH) QoL and cancer-related QoL, when compared with usual care. Prostate cancer knowledge also increased. However, there was no statistically significant effect on other domains, such as symptom-related QoL, self-efficacy, uncertainty, distress or depression. Moreover, when beneficial effects were observed, it remained uncertain whether the magnitude of effect was large enough to be considered clinically important.

Caveat

The quality of evidence for most outcomes was rated as very low, reflecting study limitations, loss to follow-up, study heterogeneity and small sample sizes. Differences in type, content, format, delivery, frequency, duration and quantity of the interventions, as well as differences in the stage of prostate cancer among participants and the lack of detailed figures related to treatment modalities, in particular androgen deprivation therapy, restrict the generalisability of these findings.

Context

As the incidence and prevalence of prostate cancer continue to rise, the number of men needing help and support to assist them in coping with disease and treatment-related symptoms and their psychosocial effects is likely to increase. Health professionals often provide interventions to address these issues.

Cochrane Systematic Review

Parahoo K et al. Psychosocial interventions for men with prostate cancer. Cochrane Reviews, 2013, Issue 12. Art. No.: CD008529.DOI: 10.1002/14651858. CD008529.pub3. This review contains 19 studies involving 3204 participants.

 

Cochrane Systematic Reviews for primary care practitioners
Developed by the Cochrane Primary Care Field, New Zealand Branch of the Australasian Cochrane Centre at the Department of General Practice and Primary Health Care, University of Auckland and funded by the Ministry of Health and New Zealand Doctor. PEARLS are meant for educational use and not to guide clinical care. New Zealanders can access the Cochrane Library free via www.cochrane.org.nz